Incredibly charming. It really was. However…it was charming
in the same way that I find Disney’s new releases of actor led classics. If you
were to watch the films, they are undeniably delightful, but ultimately you are
aware of how Cinderella ends before it even begins. The tale follows Anthony
Peardew, a now ageing man who in his youth lost his fiancée tragically the same
day he lost her keepsake, and from there on he harbours all lost items he finds
with the intention to reunite the objects with their owners. On Anthony’s death
this task is passed on to his housekeeper Laura, a woman whose age is
potentially alluded to too often, who
takes on the task with the aid of Freddy the gardener and Sunshine, a teenage local girl with down syndrome. With a sprinkling of ghostly happenings and
Sunshine’s ghostly intuition, the novel of course reaches a happy ever after.
The narrative is interwoven with stories explaining the history of the lost
objects.
First of all, the most charming element is the stories of
the lost items, such as a suicidal mother who loses a glove, a scorned sister
and a jigsaw piece, and a hair tie. I adored the short stories which explored
the history of lost objects. My mother was ill, and I gave her this book, which
to me is a summary of its light hearted and cheerful nature. On similar lines,
the characters were likeable, particularly Eugene and Bomber, although I am
unsure how I missed the gay references considering other hints in the novel
were not always as subtle.
Frustratingly, the idea behind the novel is interesting, however the execution is
predictable and one dimensional. The characters and plot behave exactly as you
expect them to, but at the same time not in a way that would ever occur in reality.
Furthermore, the ghostly elements detracted from the story – if they were
removed, the story would nonetheless exist as a coherent piece of work, just a
slightly more subtle and nuanced version. It is not symbolism or foreshadowing,
more a circled Next catalogue and a completed order form given to a husband on
the 1st of December. Similarly, the ends tie up far too neatly which
perpetuates the lack of realism, for example if there had been stories about
lost items who did not find owners, characters who do not just exist to service
the plot, or if relationship wise there were threads left loose. The references
to technology also exemplified the author’s lack of experience with it –
Instagram and Twitter were presented as a token rather than integrated into the
story, and equally cliché turns of phrase were relied on throughout.
In terms of recommendations, if predictability can be overcome,
the characters and plot are very enchanting. The basis of some really
interesting themes are laid – for example the references to writer and reader,
the book starts and end with the death of a writer and a reader, which in turn
creates a writer in Laura. Writer and reader are symbiotic, just as lost is to
found. Hogan could have considered exploration of throwaway single use society
embodied in Laura vs old fashioned make do Anthony. Fatally for this quaint novel, foreshadowing
was over-emphasised as to make it predictable, whilst interesting and
understated themes were left unexplored. Hogan had the foundations of an
excellent novel, executed in a way that is a little too unrefined for myself
personally.
*No personal photo as I have passed this book on.
Comments
Post a Comment